* Cradle of Life by J. William Schopf, Princeton University Press, $29.95, 367 pages. Reviewed in the Raleigh News & Observer on August 22, 1999.
The News & Observer
August 22, 1999
Appreciating the scum of the Earth
By Phillip Manning
Most country dwellers have seen a clear lake turn into greenish
soup almost overnight. The soup is dismissively called pond scum.
But during the last few decades scientists have learned that the
organisms in it ruled the planet for billions of years. In fact,
pond scum made our own lives possible.
Pond scum, also known as blue-green algae, is a bloom of single-celled
organisms called cyanobacteria. William Schopf, a professor of
paleobiology at UCLA, has been investigating ancient cyanobacteria
for three decades. In "Cradle of Life," he describes
his own work and that of other scientists, whose research involves
spalling ancient rocks and peering through high-powered microscopes
at slices of them to find fossilized microbes. He brings to the
subject a wealth of knowledge and an enthusiastic writing style
that features the liberal use of exclamation marks! and an occasional
lumbering sentence ("Balloonlike sphaeromorph acritarchs
have been known since . . . ."). But on the whole, the book
is an easy read, and it will captivate anyone who cares about
the history of life on Earth.
Until recently, the fossil record extended back only 550 million
years (to the Cambrian Period), when multicellular life developed.
Yet, the Earth had coalesced from solar gases about 4.5 billion
years ago. Thus, for almost 4 billion years, there was no record
of life on Earth. This gap mightily perturbed Charles Darwin:
"Why we do not find rich fossiliferous deposits belonging
to these assumed earliest periods prior to the Cambrian system,
I can give no satisfactory answer."
Scientists took a big step toward solving Darwin's dilemma in
the early 1960s, when they studied stromatolites in the hypersaline
waters of Shark Bay in Australia. Stromatolites are rocky domes
about a foot or two in diameter that resemble a stack of thin
pancakes. Geologists had assumed they were rocks created by geologic
processes. However, part of the stromatolites at Shark Bay were
undeniably alive. The uppermost layer of each stromatolite was
a sticky mat of cyanobacteria. Over time, debris sticks to the
cyanobacteria, cutting it off from sunlight. In response, the
cyanobacteria grow upward, through the debris. But not all of
them make it: Thus fossilized stromatolites contain fossilized
cyanobacteria.
After this discovery, scientists concentrated their search for
Precambrian fossils in rock formations containing stromatolites.
In 1965, William Schopf's mentor, Elso Barghoorn of Harvard University,
found the first cyanobacteria fossils. They were 1 billion years
old. With a few strokes of a geological hammer, Barghoorn had
doubled the length of the fossil record. Soon afterwards, Schopf
found the oldest fossils yet discovered - an astounding 3.5 billion
years old. Thus, life emerged on the planet within 500 million
years from the time it became livable. (During its first 500 million
years, the Earth was bombarded by meteors - some the size of Mars
- which vaporized the oceans. And because water is essential to
life, the planet was uninhabitable.)
The early Earth was a tough place. There was almost no oxygen
in the atmosphere, and no ozone layer to absorb the deadly ultraviolet
radiation that bombarded the planet. According to Schopf, the
earliest life forms lived in the shallow seas, which protected
them from radiation, and fed on glucose in the primordial soup.
But glucose was scarce, so evolution favored organisms that could
manufacture their own food by photosynthesis. Soon afterward,
the first cyanobacteria appeared.
What are these tiny organisms that existed for 3 billion years
before the first animals developed? Cyanobacteria are single-celled
photosynthesizers that eat carbon dioxide and water and exhale
oxygen. Their DNA - unlike modern plants and animals - is not
encased by a nucleus. Even compared to other microbes, cyanobacteria
are tiny, only about one-tenth the size of modern nucleated cells.
But they are incredibly hardy, which enabled them to survive the
extinctions that have regularly decimated life on our planet.
For billions of years, these single-celled organisms changed very
little. The ancient fossils that Schopf dug out of the Australian
chert closely resemble (and may be identical to) the cyanobacteria
found today in farm ponds. Why didn't they evolve? After all,
it took only a few million years for us humans to develop from
our apelike precursors.
Schopf gives a two-part answer. First, cyanobacteria are "generalists
able to survive and grow under the most varied conditions."
The second reason is sex - or the lack thereof. Cyanobacteria
reproduce by simple cell division, in which the DNA of the parent
cell uncoils and is duplicated in a daughter cell. The genetic
shuffling created by sexual reproduction does not occur in cyanobacteria;
the only genetic variability is introduced by mutation, a rare
event that happens when DNA from the parent cell is incorrectly
duplicated. Of course, about 1 billion years ago, some bacteria
must have felt something was missing from their lives, because
mutations did occur and sexual reproduction did develop. The pace
of evolution accelerated, and multicellular life followed. Some
of the resultant menagerie - snails, for example - began to feed
on cyanobacteria, which is why they no longer rule the Earth.
But for 3 million millennia, cyanobacteria were unchallenged.
With no need to evolve and only limited means to do so, they stayed
the same and - molecule by molecule - changed the world.
A human conceit that we hear often in these days of global warming
goes like this: People are the only animals smart enough (or dumb
enough, depending on your point of view) to alter the atmosphere.
That, of course, is nonsense. Long before animals arose on the
planet, cyanobacteria were transforming the atmosphere. Billions
of years of photosynthesis by pond scum produced today's oxygen-rich
atmosphere. And without it, the Earth would be devoid of animals
- including the almost hairless two-legged ones who believe that
only they can change the atmosphere.
###